Sign up | Log in



Home  >>   Daily News  >>  Vietnam  >>Economy>>Vietnam Debates the Trans-Pacific Partnership
NEW UPDATES Asean Affairs  22 October  2015  

Vietnam Debates the Trans-Pacific Partnership

Officials from the 12 countries in the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade agreement concluded talks on October 5, after years of heated negotiations. The deal must now be ratified by various individual governments before it takes effect. Nevertheless, the accord is one of the greatest accomplishments in the history of free trade agreements, gathering together countries whose gross domestic product (GDP) accounts for two-fifths of the global economy and potentially serving as the stepping stone to a larger free trade agreement for the Asia Pacific. But the TPP will surely bring about economic and institutional repercussions in a number of member economies.

In Vietnam, good news about the TPP is openly discussed on social media and among the country’s intellectuals. Vietnam is in a position of getting more gains than losses from participating in the TPP.

In economic terms, Vietnam will arguably be one of the biggest beneficiaries of the trade deal. Vietnam’s exports in apparel and footwear are expected to increase by about 50 percent. Reduction in export tariffs on Vietnamese-made products (to zero in some areas) will motivate growing foreign investment. For instance, foreign investors have bought $41.8 million in Vietnamese stocks in a few days after the signing. In general, Vietnam’s GDP and exports are anticipated to grow in the double-digits (11 percent and 28 percent, respectively) within a decade.

From a strategic standpoint, the TPP will reduce Vietnam’s economic dependence on China, which Hanoi fears Beijing may seek to exploit for political gains in the case of a conflict between the two countries.

However, the TPP will likely result in many challenges for Vietnam. Vietnam’s agricultural and pharmaceutical sectors will be vulnerable to foreign competition because the TPP will increase patent protection and be amenable to regulations that favor western-oriented business models. Dr. Nguyen Duc Thanh, director of the Hanoi-based Centre for Economic and Policy Research (VEPR), predicted in a report that Vietnam’s exports will suffer a net loss of $3.5 billion dollars, since its processed food and electronics industries will not be able to compete with those from other TPP countries such as the United States and Japan.

Moreover, major institutional and legal changes required by the agreement may not come in favor of party rule. Some of the TPP’s chapters will bolster working conditions of factory workers, increase wage rates, and prevent child labor. For instance, working hours are limited to 48 hours per week as part of the agreement. In addition, the TPP will boost workers’ bargaining power with government officials and companies. The TPP includes requirements upholding the International Labor Organization’s (ILO) Declaration of Fundamental Principle and Rights at Work. Of these requirements, the ruling Communist Party is most concerned about Convention 87, which grants workers the freedom of association and recognizes their right to strike. An independent labor union may undermine the existing system by decentralizing some decision-making power from government representatives to workers.

Businesses in Vietnam, particularly state-own enterprises (SOEs), will face many challenges in coming years. For years, Vietnamese SOEs have applied ample monopolistic practices in their commercial activities, resulting in deterioration of their service quality and lack of growth-inducing competition from the private sector. In addition, Vietnamese SOEs have also enjoyed greater access to cheap capital and credit from Vietnam’s central bank.

In contrast, the TPP’s provisions on SOEs not only go beyond existing obligations in the World Trade Organization and many of Vietnam’s existing free trade agreements in terms of transparency, but also limit any government support for SOEs that might cause adverse effects to “the interests of another TPP country.”

A central concern for most TPP members, including Vietnam, is the establishment of the investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) mechanism consisting of an independent panel of three judges, who would have the authority to rule on disputes in accordance with the TPP’s terms without being subject to any appeal within a member country’ judicial process. While this may increase foreign investors’ confidence in Vietnam’s business environment by protecting them from arbitrary intervention by Vietnamese authorities, it remains to be seen whether Vietnam’s relatively weak legal system can slowly undergo a major revamp.

In a society where everyone is accustomed to non-legal means of settling disputes, rapid legal reforms cannot be carried out in the short term. Beyond difficulties in passing strict regulations for environmental safety, working conditions, and manufacturing standards, local firms and the Vietnamese government now need to push for serious legal reforms to play by international rules. Without domestic legal reforms, the use of international laws can be manipulated to benefit cynical corporate interests.

But the ISDS mechanism should not be seen simply as an ultimate tool for multinationals’ to challenge sovereign governments. According to existing records, out of 500 ISDS cases, only in 29 percent of these cases have arbitrators upheld some or all of business claims. Now is the time for Vietnamese businesses and political leaders to answer the question on how to tackle future difficulties that the TPP will likely bring about in the following decade.

Mr. Cuong T. Nguyen is a graduate of the Committee on International Relations (CIR) at the University of Chicago, and currently a lecturer in the Faculty of International Relations at the University of Social Sciences and Humanities in Ho Chi Minh City. The opinions expressed in this article are the author’s own.

Reach Southeast Asia!
10- Nations, 560- Million Consumers
And $1 -Trillion Market
We are the Voice of Southeast Asia Media Kit
The only Media Dedicated to Southeast Asia Advertising Rates for Magazine
Online Ad Rates

Comment on this Article. Send them to

Letters that do not contain full contact information cannot be published.
Letters become the property of AseanAffairs and may be republished in any format.
They typically run 150 words or less and may be edited
submit your comment in the box below

Today's  Stories                           October 22 , 2015 Subsribe Now !
• Rice quality key to export growth Subcribe: Asean Affairs Global Magazine
• AMBD: Financial sector to contribute more towards GDP
• Brunei-Canada trade at US$17m
Research Reports
on Thailand 2007-2008

• Textiles and Garments Industry
• Coffee industry
• Leather and footwear industry
• Shrimp industry

• Inalum, Antam encouraged to buy Freeport shares
Vietnam Debates the Trans-Pacific Partnership
Asean Analysis                   October 16, 2015
• Asean Analysis October 16, 2015
Vietnam Eyes Greater International Integration—and that’s Good News for the United States
Advertise Your Brand

Asean Stock Watch  October 21,   2015
• Asean Stock Watch-October 21, 2015
The Biweekly Update
• The Biweekly Update October 16, 2015

ASEAN NEWS UPDATES      Updated: 04 January 2011

 • Women Shariah scholars see gender gap closing
• Bank Indonesia may hold key rate as inflation hits 7 percent
• Bursa Malaysia to revamp business rules
• Private property prices hit new high in Singapore • Bangkok moves on mass transport
• Thai retailers are upbeat
• Rice exports likely to decline • Vietnamese PM projects 10-year socioeconomic plan


This year in Thailand-what next?

AseanAffairs   04 January 2011
By David Swartzentruber      

It is commonplace in journalism to write two types of articles at the transition point between the year that has passed and the New Year. As this writer qualifies as an “old hand” in observing Thailand with a track record dating back 14 years, it is time take a shot at what may unfold in Thailand in 2011.

The first issue that can’t be answered is the health of Thailand’s beloved King Bhumibol, who is now 83 years old. He is the world's longest reigning monarch, but elaborate birthday celebrations in December failed to mask concern over his health. More






1.  Verifier

1. Verifier

For security purposes, we ask that you enter the security code that is shown in the graphic. Please enter the code exactly as it is shown in the graphic.
Your Code
Enter Code

Home | About Us | Contact Us | Special Feature | Features | News | Magazine | Events | TV | Press Release | Advertise With us

| Terms of Use | Site Map | Privacy Policy  | DISCLAIMER |

Version 5.0
Copyright © 2006-2020 TIME INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT ENTERPRISES CO., LTD. All rights reserved.
Bangkok, Thailand