Sign up | Log in



Home  >>   Daily News  >>   Philippines News  >>   Politics  >>   Philippine Congress passes population bill
NEWS UPDATES Asean Affairs   20 December 2012 

Philippine Congress passes population bill


Philippine Senators Miriam Defensor-Santiago and Pia Cayetano embraced each other as they stood in the middle of the session hall, while Senate President Pro Tempore Jose “Jinggoy” Estrada announced yessterday night the 13-8 vote approving the reproductive health (RH) or population bill.

It was a long-delayed triumph for both women who gained enemies for their defence of what they believed was a measure that would give a woman the choice to determine the number of her children, meet a teener’s need to be protected from an unplanned pregnancy and educate citizens about sexual health.

“There is no force more powerful than an idea whose time has come and that idea today is the RH bill,” Santiago said. Before the voting, the bill had languished in Congress for 13 years.

A quarter before 8 last night, senators approved Senate Bill No. 2865 on third and final reading, less than an hour after they did the same on second reading.

The vote in the Senate paves the way for the measure to become law after the House of Representatives also approved on third reading last night the bill that President Benigno Aquino III had certified as urgent.

The “miracle” that anti-RH groups were waiting for did not materialise, as the House voted 133-79-7 to pass House Bill No. 4244 on final reading, increasing the winning margin to 54. In the second reading on Thursday, the chamber voted 113-104-3.

The two chambers will have to reconcile their versions of the bill in a bicameral conference committee so Aquino can sign the measure into law.
Senate leaders have yet to name their representatives to the bicameral conference that Santiago wants to convene Tuesday.

The Palace hailed both houses of Congress for their “historic vote” and crafting a law “that can truly address the needs of our people”.

“The people now have the government on their side as they raise their families in a manner that is just and empowered,” presidential spokesperson Edwin Lacierda said. “It begins a process of healing for the wounds that may have been opened by an often feisty democracy.”

Albay Representative Edcel Lagman, sponsor of the House bill, was optimistic that the bicameral committee would face no serious roadblock in reconcilling contrasting provisions with the Senate version. He said the committee could meet Tuesday and have the final version ready for ratification by Wednesday.

“Before the end of the year, it will become a law as long as we can harmonise the differing provisions in the bicameral conference committee,” Lagman told reporters.

“Considering that these two bills are mutually identical from the start and the differences were in the period of amendments, I don’t think the differences are insurmountable. We could fast-track the forging of a bicam report, I think, within a day.”

In the Senate, those who voted with the two sponsors in favour of the highly contentious RH bill were Senate Minority Leader Alan Peter Cayetano, Senators Edgardo Angara, Joker Arroyo, Franklin Drilon, Francis Escudero, Teofisto Guingona III, Panfilo Lacson, Loren Legarda, Ferdinand Marcos Jr., Francis Pangilinan and Ralph Recto.

Those against were Senate President Juan Ponce Enrile, Estrada, Majority Leader Vicente Sotto, Senators Gregorio Honasan, Aquilino Pimentel III, Antonio Trillanes IV and Manuel Villar.

Senators Manuel “Lito” Lapid and Sergio Osmeña III were not in the session hall during the vote.

 “I will not gloat. In fact, my work has just begun. … This is for every woman wallowing in poverty, for those who don’t even know they have the right not to be beaten up by their partners,” Cayetano said after the head count to emphasise the continuing struggle for women’s rights.

Cayetano failed to fight tears as she thanked all those who supported her efforts for the past 17 months in having the measure approved.
Santiago, in turn, cited Nicolaus Copernicus who contradicted Catholic teaching at a time when the Church insisted that the sun revolved around the Earth.

“The Catholic Church has made many mistakes because it is a human institution,” she said. Santiago’s statement appeared to be indirectly addressed to religious groups against the RH bill.

Fear of a Catholic backlash appeared to be one of the biggest reasons Congress’ decision to pass the RH bill that had been derailed since it was first introduced in 1995.

Sotto and Enrile, the most rabid among anti-RH senators, have openly sided with the Church hierarchy in shooting down the measure.
Other senators stood up after the head count to explain their vote.

Angara cited the rising number of teenage pregnancies as an imperative for his “yes” vote.

Arroyo warned he would change his “yes” vote should drastic alterations be made in the Senate version during the bicameral conference.

Minority Leader Cayetano said the RH bill’s approval was not tantamount to a promotion of promiscuity. “We should fight misconceptions if we want to help our people,” he said.

Estrada lamented the wedge driven between the Church and RH supporters because of the measure.

Escudero said he was against abortion, but supported the rights of women and children, especially the unborn.

“I want to give all Filipinos equal opportunity, men and women, young or old, that’s why I favour the RH bill. I do not favour premarital sex. I am for the protection of the rights of women and children,” he said.

Before the vote, Sotto’s proposal to delete the word “satisfying” in the definition of reproductive health was met with vehement objection from the Senate’s three women members. This forced him to withdraw this amendment.

Sotto initially explained that the word “satisfying” ran counter to the “conservative” culture of Filipino women.

The three women senators stood up one by one and blasted Sotto’s statement. Cayetano and Legarda said Filipino women had the right to have satisfying sex.

Santiago went to the extent of vowing to file a bill that would penalise a husband “who does not give satisfying sex to his wife”.

In explaining his vote, Guingona said the bill was “about our dreams and aspirations”, and the country’s future. Lacson lauded those who opposed the bill for allowing the majority rule to prevail.

Honasan noted in his explanation that he was living in a highly matriarchal family.

Legarda dedicated her “yes” vote to Filipino women, while Marcos noted the agony of young people when faced with “a situation they are ill-prepared for,” thus his promise to improve “the pathetic state of affairs” by voting for the RH bill.

“What bothers me is a proposal wrapped in a condom argument,” Pimentel said. “I cannot accept the twisted rationale to legislate what is better left to the conscience of married couples,” he added.

Recto appealed to sponsors to maintain fidelity to the version approved by the Senate during the bicameral conference.

“I hope dead provisions would not be resurrected like zombies and newly birthed ideas not aborted in the third chamber,” he said, referring to the bicameral panel.

Revilla revealed he was the third senator whose child was born with complications after his wife took pills in the early stages of pregnancy.

“My daughter’s name was Maria Alexandra. She was born in 1990 and lived only for 26 days because of heart complications as Lani took pills not realising she was already pregnant,” Revilla said, his voice shaking.

Apart from Revilla, Lapid and Sotto confessed during RH interpellations that their wives had given birth to babies suffering from complications due to pills the women took while pregnant.

“Why can’t we spend the money on infrastructure or projects to help poor people, instead of using it to buy harmful things?” Revilla said.
Sotto noted that the Palace certified a contentious bill as urgent, instead of measures that were “more necessary”.

“If Cory Aquino were alive, this bill would not even reach first base,” he said.

Enrile, who cast the last vote, said the bill “inflicted a very wide chasm of division” not only in the chamber but also in Philippine society.

“I hope this bill we now dispose of tonight will bring the benefits it seeks to accomplish,” he said.

In the House, RH bill supporters, clad in purple, shouted in jubilation from the gallery as soon as Deputy Speaker Arnulfo Fuentebella announced the results.

After the vote, supporters of the bill gave out purple orchids to lawmakers and applauded them as they left the session hall to greet fellow advocates.

A dismayed Antipolo Bishop Gabriel Reyes said the House made a “big mistake” by passing the bill. “We tried hard (to campaign against it) because we are convinced that it’s bad for people, not only Catholics, but all people,” he told reporters.

Reyes attributed the wider margin of victory for the RH bill to the president’s certification and to “pressures” exerted by the Palace on House members.

Lagman downplayed the impact of the president’s certification of the bill. “The inherent merit of the RH bill was its badge for passage and the presidential certification was the assurance for its approval,” he said in a statement.

“While the certification by the president of the necessity for immediate enactment of the RH bill sealed its enactment, the intrinsic merit of the measure and its laudable objectives galvanised legislators’ support and justified the presidential endorsement,” he said.

Conspicuously absent during the voting was Sarangani Rep. Manny Pacquiao, who was celebrating his birthday Monday. He voted against the bill last Thursday.

The anti-RH bloc also missed the vote of Fuentebella, who was asked to preside over the proceedings. This allowed Deputy Speaker Erin Tañada to cast his vote in favour of the measure.

Parañaque Rep. Roilo Golez, a staunch opponent of the RH bill, did not help his group’s cause when he abstained. Deputy Speaker Raul Daza, another known critic of the bill, was again not present on the floor.

Reach Southeast Asia!
10- Nations, 560- Million Consumers
And $1 -Trillion Market
We are the Voice of Southeast Asia Media Kit
The only Media Dedicated to Southeast Asia Advertising Rates for Magazine
  Online Ad Rates

Comment on this Article. Send them to

Letters that do not contain full contact information cannot be published.
Letters become the property of AseanAffairs and may be republished in any format.
They typically run 150 words or less and may be edited
submit your comment in the box below

Today's  Stories    20 December 2012  
Subsribe Now !
• Asean-India FTA: Negotiations on services, investment in final stages   Subcribe: Asean Affairs Global Magazine
• Malaysia lifts ban on religious travel to Israel Asean Affairs Premium
• Indonesia and Malaysia aim for $30b in trade by 2015
• Myanmar proposes reducing area of Dawei project
Research Reports
on Thailand 2007-2008

•Textiles and Garments Industry

•Coffee industry

•Leather and footwear industry

•Shrimp industry

• Philippines growing economy fails to halt joblessness
• US to train Myanmar troops  
• Myanmar quake stirs 'End of Days' fear  
• ADB announces $525m three-year 'pipeline' for Cambodia  
• Former Thai PM Abhisit could face 700 attempted murder charges  
• Thailand, Myanmar seek Japan for Dawei project  
• Philippine Congress passes population bill  
• Demand for Philippines office space breaks record  
• World Bank sees continued 'healthy' growth in Cambodia
Asean Analysis              17 December 2012      Advertise Your Brand
• Asean Analysis- December 17, 2012  
• Asean Weekly-  December 7, 2012 Sponsor Our Events

Asean Stock Watch      19 December 2012   

• Asean Stock Watch- Demcember 19, 2012 

ASEAN NEWS UPDATES      Updated: 04 January 2011

 • Women Shariah scholars see gender gap closing
• Bank Indonesia may hold key rate as inflation hits 7 percent

• Bursa Malaysia to revamp business rules
• Private property prices hit new high in Singapore • Bangkok moves on mass transport
• Thai retailers are upbeat
• Rice exports likely to decline • Vietnamese PM projects 10-year socioeconomic plan


This year in Thailand-what next?

AseanAffairs   04 January 2011
By David Swartzentruber      

It is commonplace in journalism to write two types of articles at the transition point between the year that has passed and the New Year. As this writer qualifies as an “old hand” in observing Thailand with a track record dating back 14 years, it is time take a shot at what may unfold in Thailand in 2011.

The first issue that can’t be answered is the health of Thailand’s beloved King Bhumibol, who is now 83 years old. He is the world's longest reigning monarch, but elaborate birthday celebrations in December failed to mask concern over his health. More






1.  Verifier

1. Verifier

For security purposes, we ask that you enter the security code that is shown in the graphic. Please enter the code exactly as it is shown in the graphic.
Your Code
Enter Code

Home | About Us | Contact Us | Special Feature | Features | News | Magazine | Events | TV | Press Release | Advertise With us

Our Products | Work with us | Terms of Use | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Refund Policy | Shipping/Delivery Policy | DISCLAIMER |

Version 5.0
Copyright © 2007-2015 TIME INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT ENTERPRISES CO., LTD. All rights reserved.
Bangkok, Thailand