Sign up | Log in



Home  >>  Daily News  >>  Myanmar News  >>  Politics  >>  Junta’s court turns down Suu Kyi's appeal

2 October2009
Related Stories

October 1, 2009
US-Myanmar Talks: No breakthrough yet

September 27, 2009
UN chief calls on Asean to get tougher on Myanmar

September 25, 2009
US in talks with Myanmar junta

September 19, 2009
Myanmar junta releases political prisoners, excluding Suu Kyi

September 11, 2009
Report: Myanmar junta’s gas money kept in Singapore banks

August 29, 2009
Fighting in Myanmar forces 30,000 to cross border to China

August 24, 2009
Myanmar to hold mid-year gems emporium in Oct-Nov

Junta’s court turns down Suu Kyi's appeal

A court in military-ruled Myanmar turned aside opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi's latest bid for freedom Friday, rejecting an appeal against her most recent sentence of house arrest, the Associated Press reported, quoting government sources.

Suu Kyi was convicted and sentenced in August for sheltering an uninvited American at her home for two days earlier this year, in a verdict that drew international condemnation and ensured that she would not be able to participate in elections scheduled for next year.

She argued in an appeal that the conviction was unwarranted, but the Yangon Division court ruled against the appeal Friday, said the sources, speaking on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the case.

Already in detention for about 14 of the last 20 years, the Nobel Peace Prize winner was sentenced in August to another 18 months for sheltering the American, John Yettaw.

He has said he wanted to warn Suu Kyi he had a "vision" that she would be assassinated. He was sentenced to seven years in prison but released on humanitarian grounds and deported less than a week after the verdict.

Suu Kyi's lawyer Nyan Win said ahead of Friday's ruling that the defense would take the case to the Supreme Court if her appeal is rejected.

"We have made all necessary plans for any outcome," Nyan win said.

Security was tight Friday, with riot police ringing the court house.

In the appeal, Suu Kyi's lawyers raised no new substantive arguments that had not been heard in the original district court trial.

Myanmar's courts almost always follow the same hard line toward Suu Kyi and the country's democracy movement, which the military government often accuses of collaborating with the country's enemies to destroy the nation.

But Friday's ruling came amid a tentative change in the political winds, after the United States announced last week it was modifying its tough policy of seeking only to isolate the military regime and would instead try to engage it through high-level talks.

The US will not give up its political and economic sanctions against the regime. It and other Western nations apply sanctions because of Myanmar's poor human rights record and its failure to turn over power to Suu Kyi's party.

US Assistant Secretary of State Kurt Campbell, the top U.S. diplomat for East Asia, told the Senate Foreign Relations Asia subcommittee Wednesday that lifting sanctions as the administration tries to start a dialogue, without Myanmar making any democratic changes, would be a mistake.

At the same time, the 64-year-old Suu Kyi has made what appears to be a confidence-building gesture toward the junta, suggesting last week in a letter to leader Senior Gen. Than Shwe she was willing to cooperate with it to have the sanctions lifted, according to a statement from her National League for Democracy party.

She had previously welcomed sanctions as a way to pressure the junta to achieve political reconciliation with the pro-democracy movement. The movement has insisted on concessions from the government if they are to work together, particularly the freeing of political prisoners and the reopening of party offices around the country.

Suu Kyi was convicted August 11 and sentenced to three years in prison with hard labor after Yettaw secretly swam to her home. The sentence was commuted to 18 months of house arrest by Than Shwe.

Suu Kyi has described the conviction as unfair. Authorities would not let her attend the appeal hearing.

The appeal contended that the law under which she was charged is invalid because it applies to a constitution abolished two decades ago.


Comment on this Article. Send them to
Letters that do not contain full contact information cannot be published.
Letters become the property of AseanAffairs and may be republished in any format.
They typically run 150 words or less and may be edited
submit your comment in the box below 





1.  Verifier

1. Verifier

For security purposes, we ask that you enter the security code that is shown in the graphic. Please enter the code exactly as it is shown in the graphic.
Your Code
Enter Code

Home | About Us | Contact Us | Special Feature | Features | News | Magazine | Events | TV | Press Release | Advertise With us

Our Products | Work with us | Terms of Use | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Refund Policy | Shipping/Delivery Policy | DISCLAIMER |

Version 5.0
Copyright © 2007-2015 TIME INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT ENTERPRISES CO., LTD. All rights reserved.
Bangkok, Thailand