Google

ASEANAFFAIRS
Sign up | Log in

    ASEAN PROFILES

  ASEAN KEY DESTINATIONS

Home  >>  Daily News  >>  ASEAN ANALYSIS

ASEAN ANALYSIS

Asean Affairs   17 July 2012


Don’t Leave U.S. Companies on the Sidelines of Myanmar

Charlene Barshefsky and Stapleton Roy

July 11, 2012

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s visit to Southeast Asia this week and her meeting with U.S. and Southeast Asian businessman in Cambodia on Friday give her the ideal platform to spell out what the U.S. government plans to do about its economic sanctions against Myanmar, also known as Burma.  

Myanmar and the United States stand at the most important crossroads since the military seized control of that ill-fated country five decades ago. The strong showing by Aung San Suu Kyi and her party in by-elections in April coupled with a raft of other political and economic reforms over the past year have convinced many countries, including the United States, to soften or drop their economic sanctions against Myanmar.  

Secretary of State Clinton announced May 17 that the United States would suspend sanctions against financial transactions and investment by U.S. companies in Myanmar. But so far nothing has happened. An interagency group from various government departments has met several times to hammer out the conditions of what is known as a general license that would govern the terms under which U.S. companies could begin operating in Myanmar.  

More than a month later U.S. companies are still waiting.  It is urgent that this license be granted quickly to ensure that American firms are fully engaged with Myanmar during this time of political and economic transition and that they are not left behind as companies from other countries charge ahead and seize opportunities.

The competitiveness of American companies should not be the primary driver in the decision to suspend sanctions – and indeed it was and is not – but once a decision is made, timing becomes critically important.  Further delay only disadvantages U.S. firms with no corresponding policy advantage for the U.S. government.
 
Suspension of sanctions does not mean that suddenly U.S. companies will be doing business with the bad actors originally targeted by sanctions. The Treasury Department’s list of Special Designated Nationals, individuals, and companies implicated in human rights abuses will continue to prohibit U.S. companies from deals with those involved in drug trafficking, money laundering and other nefarious activities.

The debate within the interagency group is reportedly focused at least in part on what conditions should be put on U.S. companies investing in Myanmar and whether certain sectors should be excluded.  Many companies are open to transparent reporting about their investments to the government, but fear stringent conditions that amount to backdoor sanctions.

More broadly, the United States should explore a longer term effort to deepen relations and encourage reform with Myanmar. While the easing of investment and financial services sanctions is a welcome and necessary step, a host of other sanctions, including a ban on imports, remain in place.

Recently, foreign governments that had earlier imposed economic sanctions on Myanmar have rolled them back. The European Union, Australia, and Norway are now reengaging with Myanmar to the benefit of their companies and jobs for their workers.  Large business delegations from the United Kingdom, France, Australia, and other countries have visited the country in recent months.

Japan, which did not impose sanctions on Myanmar, has agreed to $6.1 billion in debt forgiveness and restored full-fledged development aid. This will pave the way for Japanese firms to build power plants and other major infrastructure projects in Myanmar.

For the U.S. government to suspend sanctions but then withhold timely approval leaves U.S. businesses out in the cold. This will not encourage Myanmar’s broader economic reform process or help the country build a sound industrial base. Nor will it enhance U.S. credibility in the region at a time when Washington is seeking to rebalance its ties to Asia.

U.S. companies, by law and tradition, have some of the highest standards in the world when it comes to transparency and corporate governance. The involvement of well-run U.S. companies in sectors from manufacturing to agriculture and natural resources can help establish international best practices, respect for labor and human rights, rule of law, measures to rein in corruption, and environmental protection in those industries. Keeping U.S. businesses on the sidelines will not only give a head start to investors from other countries less inclined to prioritize these important issues, but also deprive ordinary Myanmar citizens of much-needed, non-exploitative employment opportunities.

Changing the status quo in Myanmar’s natural resource industries, for example, by inviting U.S. competition into these sectors could help dilute the monopolistic grip of state-owned enterprises and businesses linked to corrupt officials and state-owned companies loyal to the military. Keeping American companies out of the bidding for developing energy and natural resources in Myanmar simply ensures that lower-standard operators that are not bound by the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act or ignore environmental imperatives dominate the sector. Myanmar is in dire need of capacity building throughout its economy. Opening the door to well-governed U.S. companies could also help draw a highly talented Burmese diaspora back home to help reconstruct their country.

Myanmar’s road to full economic engagement will be uneven and slow. But further delays by the United States will result in a missed opportunity to let American businesses, which are the world’s most innovative and dynamic, actively engage with the people of Myanmar to upgrade their devastated infrastructure and build factories and farms to create jobs in both countries.

Charlene Barshefsky and J. Stapleton Roy serve on a U.S.-ASEAN Eminent Persons Group appointed by President Barack Obama to advise the United States and the countries of Southeast Asia on steps to bolster their relations.  Barshefsky is a former U.S. trade representative and Roy is a former U.S. ambassador to China, Indonesia and Singapore. CSIS Southeast Asia Program serves as the secretariat for the U.S. members of the
 U.S.-ASEAN Eminent Persons Group.



Reach Southeast Asia!
10- Nations, 560- Million Consumers
And $1 -Trillion Market
We are the Voice of Southeast Asia Media Kit
The only Media Dedicated to Southeast Asia Advertising Rates for Magazine
  Online Ad Rates
Contact: marketing@aseanaffairs.com

Comment on this Article. Send them to  your.views@aseanaffairs.com

Letters that do not contain full contact information cannot be published.
Letters become the property of AseanAffairs and may be republished in any format.
They typically run 150 words or less and may be edited
 
or
submit your comment in the box below
Name

Name


Email

Email



1.  Verifier

1. Verifier

For security purposes, we ask that you enter the security code that is shown in the graphic. Please enter the code exactly as it is shown in the graphic.
Your Code
Enter Code



 
Today's  Stories    17 July 2012  Subsribe Now !
• South China discord makes Asean fail to ...  
Subcribe: Asean Affairs Global Magazine
• China rejects blame Asean’s failure to reach  Asean Affairs Premium

• GMS receives US$50m in new US aid as...

Research Reports
on Thailand 2007-2008

•Textiles and Garments Industry

•Coffee industry

•Leather and footwear industry

•Shrimp industry

• Thai Tourism looking at Asean to offset
• Acute water shortage in Malaysia may lead  
• Thai ruling party plans on limiting authority
 
Asean Analysis              17 July 2012 Advertise Your Brand
• Asean Analysis- JuLy 17, 2012  
• Asean Analysis- JuLy 13, 2012 Sponsor Our Events

Asean Stock Watch      12 JuLY 2012 

 
• Asean Stock Watch-July 12, 2012 p

ASEAN NEWS UPDATES      Updated: 04 January 2011

 • Women Shariah scholars see gender gap closing
• Bank Indonesia may hold key rate as inflation hits 7 percent

• Bursa Malaysia to revamp business rules
• Private property prices hit new high in Singapore • Bangkok moves on mass transport
• Thai retailers are upbeat
• Rice exports likely to decline • Vietnamese PM projects 10-year socioeconomic plan

ASEAN  ANALYSIS

This year in Thailand-what next?

AseanAffairs   04 January 2011
By David Swartzentruber      

It is commonplace in journalism to write two types of articles at the transition point between the year that has passed and the New Year. As this writer qualifies as an “old hand” in observing Thailand with a track record dating back 14 years, it is time take a shot at what may unfold in Thailand in 2011.

The first issue that can’t be answered is the health of Thailand’s beloved King Bhumibol, who is now 83 years old. He is the world's longest reigning monarch, but elaborate birthday celebrations in December failed to mask concern over his health. More

 

Home | About Us | Contact Us | Special Feature | Features | News | Magazine | Events | TV | Press Release | Advertise With us

Our Products | Work with us | Terms of Use | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Refund Policy | Shipping/Delivery Policy | DISCLAIMER |

Version 5.0
Copyright © 2007-2015 TIME INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT ENTERPRISES CO., LTD. All rights reserved.
Bangkok, Thailand
asean@aseanaffairs.com